All articles will be evaluated in parallel by at least two members of the scientific committee, being a double-blind review (reviewers do not know the author of the article, the author does not know the name of the reviewers). Evaluation criteria to be followed are:
- novelty of the topic;
- quality of research methodology;
- clarity of presentation;
- relevant bibliographic sources used and contributions to the field.
The editorial team will consider that the evaluator does not come from the same institution as the author/authors of the research subject to evaluation.
The result of the evaluation may be:
- acceptance with no changes
- acceptance with minor changes
- acceptance with review and resubmission
- rejection
The result of the evaluation will be communicated to the authors and the articles / papers approved / accepted by the scientific committee will be published.