Review process

All articles will be evaluated in parallel by at least two members of the scientific committee, being a double-blind review (reviewers do not know the author of the article, the author does not know the name of the reviewers). Evaluation criteria to be followed are:

  • novelty of the topic;
  • quality of research methodology;
  • clarity of presentation;
  • relevant bibliographic sources used and contributions to the field. 

The editorial team will consider that the evaluator does not come from the same institution as the author/authors of the research subject to evaluation.

The result of the evaluation may be:

  • acceptance with no changes
  • acceptance with minor changes
  • acceptance with review and resubmission
  • rejection

The result of the evaluation will be communicated to the authors and the articles / papers approved / accepted by the scientific committee will be published.